|
Item |
Topic |
Contributor |
|
1. |
Opening of meeting at 1400 14 January |
|
|
2. |
Welcome |
Alain Dickinson |
|
3. |
Administrative arrangements. |
Jim Sharp (MetOffice) Dominique Marbouty (ECMWF) |
|
4. |
Introductions |
All |
|
5. |
Aims and objectives · History of bid to become RM for SRNWP interoperability · Benefits of interoperability. · Desired outcomes
|
|
|
6. |
Scope of Interoperability System and relevant application areas. a. Business Continuity b. Model initialisation and boundary condition exchange c. Verification d. Surface exchange modelling e. Ensembles
|
|
|
|
Presentations
a. INM experience with multi-model ensemble b. Interoperability with regard to boundary conditions
|
|
|
7. |
Tea/coffee at 1600.
|
|
|
8. |
Current Work of Relevance Experience in TIGGE with NETCDF vs GRIB2
|
Chair
|
|
|
Presentations
a. ALADIN view of way forward b. Interoperability aspects of TIGGE LAM
c. Experience in TIGGE with NETCDF vs GRIB 2 d. Technical aspects of GRIB2 vs NETCDF
|
|
|
8. |
End of day 1 Met Office hosted dinner at Pepe Sale, restaurant, Reading.
Day 2 start at 0900.
|
|
|
9 |
Summary of key technical issues from day 1 |
Ulrich Schaettler, Rachel North |
|
10. |
Formulation of Proposal for EUMETNET Council · Core or optional programme? · Funding model (full funding for consortia or coordination only) · Downstream maintenance of software. · Options to present
|
Alain Dickinson
|
|
11. |
Coffee break followed by Presentation of key outcomes and decisions of meeting |
|
|
12. |
Closure of meeting by 1200 |
|